|
| 流域水生态系统服务价值评估理论范式与框架重构 |
| A Reconstructed Theoretical Paradigm and Framework for Valuing Watershed Ecosystem Services |
| 投稿时间：2025-08-04 修订日期：2025-08-06 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 流域水生态系统 生态系统服务价值评估 理论框架 动态评估 多元价值 社会-生态系统 |
| 英文关键词:watershed ecosystem ecosystem service valuation theoretical framework dynamic assessment plural value Social-Ecological System (SES) |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目（黄河水科学研究联合基金）（U2443208; U2243601）；广西重点研发计划（桂科AB25069137）；国家重点研发计划项目（2024YFC321090003）；北京院核心技术攻关项目（ZT2024-07） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 39 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 针对当前流域水生态价值评估存在的理论割裂、方法固化及结果缺乏动态表征等问题,亟需重构整合性评估框架以弥补传统体系对生态系统整体性、动态演变及社会-文化价值的忽视。基于价值哲学、生态系统服务理论及社会-生态系统(SES)理论,构建以“结构-过程-功能-服务-福祉”为主线的“三维-四层”动态评估体系,整合生态-物理、功能-服务、社会-经济三维度,贯通基础要素、过程核算、价值评估、决策应用四层级。提出三大理论突破：1)建立动态时序评估模型,实现价值流与生态系统健康响应的耦合；2)突破单一货币度量,构建生态-社会-文化融合的多元价值矩阵；3)显示化人类活动的影响,揭示SES反馈机制对价值演变的驱动作用。该框架为流域综合治理和生态补偿决策提供系统性理论工具,但需突破多源数据融合、跨尺度模型耦合及政策转化等实施瓶颈,以实现生态价值评估从理论构建到实践应用的全链条贯通。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Current valuations of watershed ecosystem services are often constrained by theoretical fragmentation, methodological rigidity, and static outcomes. To address these limitations, this paper reconstructs an integrated assessment framework designed to overcome the failure of conventional approaches to capture ecosystem integrity, dynamic evolution, and socio-cultural values. Drawing upon the philosophy of value, ecosystem service theory, and Social-Ecological System (SES) theory, we propose a dynamic assessment system structured around the “Structure-Process-Function-Service-Wellbeing” cascade. This system is conceptualized as a “three-dimensional, four-tiered” framework that integrates eco-physical, functional-service, and socio-economic dimensions, while linking four hierarchical tiers: foundational elements, process accounting, value assessment, and decision-making application. This framework introduces three primary theoretical advances: 1) establishing a dynamic spatio-temporal assessment model that couples the flow of values with ecosystem health responses; 2) moving beyond singular monetary metrics by developing a pluralistic value matrix that integrates ecological, social, and cultural dimensions; and 3) visualizing the impact of human activities and revealing the driving role of SES feedback mechanisms on value evolution. The framework provides a systematic theoretical tool for integrated watershed governance and decision-making on ecological compensation. However, its implementation requires overcoming critical bottlenecks, including multi-source data fusion, cross-scale model coupling, and effective policy translation, to bridge the gap from theoretical construction to practical application in ecosystem service valuation. |
| 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
